Search for: "C. J. Apple III, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
 Both petitioners (Ethicon and LifeScan) are owned by J&J. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am by Ross Davies
Apple, Inc. - Christy Susman, Letter to Patrick Wensink, Jack Daniel's, July 12, 2012 [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
Big Apple Consulting USA, Inc., MJMM Investments, LLC, Marc Jablon, Matthew Maguire, Mark C. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:46 am
It is now common ground that feature C(iii) was not implicit in claim 2. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
  Dynamic Societal Constitutionalism: Transnational corporations’ outward expression of inward self-constitution: The enforcement of  human rights by Apple, Inc. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
AE’s position was that L&S could not establish (a) and (c). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
SkyKick asked the High Court, in the guise of Birss J, for a referral to the CJEU to ask whether the abolition of the own name defence is contrary to fundamental EU Rights and is therefore invalid. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
Springtime is the time for flowers, which makes it totally appropriate that the first little buds should begin to appear in Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, a reference to the Court of the European Union (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 9:50 am by Julius Stobbs
Representations of the 747 Design are as follows:- The Magnitone ‘Barefaced’ device:-   The Informed User Referring to the summary of the law as set out in Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC, Carr J defined the informed user in this case as the observant user of powered skin brushes. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
(c) all counterclaims, cross-claims and third party claims; (d) all common law claims, based on contract, tort, fraud, or intentional torts; (e) all claims based on a violation of any state or federal constitution, statute or regulation; . . . [read post]